Blogs > New Politics >

Most radical budget since Whitlam? Housing reform, poverty and the future of the Australian economy

Most radical budget since Whitlam? Housing reform, poverty and the future of the Australian economy

The 2026 Australian federal Budget has triggered outrage from conservative commentators, who are branding it everything from a “Whitlam budget” to outright “Marxism”. But the reaction says more about the collapse of the bipartisan consensus on neoliberalism than it does about the Budget itself. After four decades of governments protecting
The questions that still need to be asked: Intelligence failures and the limits of the antisemitism Royal Commission

The questions that still need to be asked: Intelligence failures and the limits of the antisemitism Royal Commission

The interim findings of the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion have been released with a certain level of caution, containing a series of recommendations that, on the surface at least, appear to be largely uncontroversial – mainly relating to gun control measures and increased resources for policing. Yet

Most radical budget since Whitlam? Housing reform, poverty and the future of the Australian economy

Most radical budget since Whitlam? Housing reform, poverty and the future of the Australian economy
The 2026 Australian federal Budget has triggered outrage from conservative commentators, who are branding it everything from a “Whitlam budget” to outright “Marxism”. But the reaction says more about the collapse of the bipartisan consensus on neoliberalism than it does about the Budget itself. After four decades of governments protecting

The questions that still need to be asked: Intelligence failures and the limits of the antisemitism Royal Commission

The questions that still need to be asked: Intelligence failures and the limits of the antisemitism Royal Commission
The interim findings of the Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion have been released with a certain level of caution, containing a series of recommendations that, on the surface at least, appear to be largely uncontroversial – mainly relating to gun control measures and increased resources for policing. Yet